SMSF property improvements - possible under an LRBA?

About six months ago I published an article entitled ‘Can you renovate a property purchased under a SMSF limited recourse loan?’.  Unfortunately at the time I could not answer the question around whether SMSF property improvements where allowable on a property owned by an SMSF where a limited recourse borrowing is in place.

This article on SMSF property improvements is out of date.  Please read the following article for more information:

ATO Opens Door on SMSF Property Improvements

It’s important to understand that SMSF property improvements are allowable when an SMSF has a limited recourse borrowing provided the renovations do not create such a significant change that a replacement asset is created.

Are SMSF property improvements possible with an LRBA?

The ATO has since made comments confirming my fears – a property purchased by a SMSF using a limited recourse loan cannot be renovated or improved – regardless of the source of the funds used to pay for the renovations.

So why has this policy stance been taken?  The Federal government believes (on the advice of Treasury) that enabling SMSF trustees to renovate, improve or develop properties purchased using SMSF limited recourse loans will increase the value of SMSF assets that the bank can get their hands on in the event of a default.

I actually agree with the reasoning behind their stance, however I also believe that the vast majority of SMSF trustees are aware of this risk and will take it into consideration before undertaking any property renovations or development.  A SMSF is all about control and flexibility, and this particular policy seems to go against those factors.

It is also important to realise that the restriction on property development or renovation does not apply to properties that are directly owned by a SMSF (without a loan) or to any properties indirectly owned by a SMSF – such as via a unit trust, joint venture or tenants in common arrangement.

So we now know that we cannot improve a property which a SMSF owns under a limited recourse loan agreement – but what is an improvement and what is a repair?

Repairs versus improvements

To answer this question we need to look at the tax laws – specifically Taxation Ruling 97/23 which will tell us what is a repair (which is OK under the super laws) and what would constitute an improvement (which is NOT OK under the super laws):

  • A repair is the act of making good defects, damage or deterioration, including the renewal of parts.
  • An improvement to an asset provides a greater efficiency of function in a property. It brings something into a more valuable or desirable form or condition than would be achieved by a repair.

I will not attempt to provide examples to demonstrate the difference between repairs and improvements – there are plenty contained in the tax ruling.

To add even more complexity, something which may be considered an improvement for taxation purposes (and hence no tax deduction for the expense paid by the SMSF in that year), may not necessarily be considered an improvement and create a replacement asset under the superannuation rules.

This means SMSF trustees will likely need to speak to their own accountant to get advice surrounding their specific situation.

Compliance approach by the ATO

The good news is that the commission of taxation, Michael D’Ascenzo has stated “we (the ATO) will not be seeking to make fine distinctions having regard to what is available to repair what has been damaged” and also that the ATO would “be favourably inclined to” deem a fund to be complying for super regulatory purposes.

The impact for trustees will likely not cause their SMSF to become non-complying if they undertake what they believe to be reasonable and necessary ‘repairs’, but then those ‘repairs’ are deemed to be SMSF property improvements.  This does not give trustees licence to start knocking down walls or adding extensions, however a coat of paint and new light fittings should be OK.

The other positive impact is for SMSF trustees who have properties which may be impacted by natural disasters such as floods or destroyed by fires.  If the trustees are lucky enough to have insurance cover to pay for the rebuild, they would be able to do so without the ATO making their SMSF non-compliant for a technical breach of the replacement asset rules contained in s67B of the SIS Act.

Even though the ATO appears to be saying they will take a common sense approach in regard to this issue, if you are a SMSF trustee and you have (or a looking to acquire) a property using a SMSF loan, you need to check the insurance policy to ensure that your fund can choose to receive a cash payment to enable the loan to be repaid – rather than just coverage to pay for any damages or rebuilding.

In summary, if you are looking to purchase a ‘renovators delight’ inside a SMSF using a limited recourse loan, you are out of luck – you won’t be able to use this strategy without breaching the replacement asset rules contained in the super laws.  However, you are still  able to maintain and repair your property where necessary to ensure it doesn’t drop in value.

If you have any questions regarding this article, please comment below or contact me.



  • Superannuationau

    May 27, 2011 at 6:01 am

    SMSF allow people to manage their own super investments for their retirement.

  • A-evans2

    June 10, 2011 at 2:11 am

    Can a commercial tenant make (and of course pay for ) improvements/ renovations to a SMSF owned commercial property to suit the business..

    • Kris_Evolved

      June 10, 2011 at 7:28 am

      Yes – but caution is needed.

      In many cases this makes sense.  These ‘improvements’ are typically considered as leasehold improvements which are owned by (and depreciated by) the tenant.

      The lease agreement should deal with leasehold improvements – i.e. the tenant has to return the property to it’s original state at the expiration of the lease.

      If the tenant leaves them in place when they leave, then this will generally be a wind-fall capital gain for the SMSF, and should be treated as a seperate asset owned by the SMSF directly (rather than via the bare trust). 

      Caution is needed if the tenant and SMSF are related parties and also need to be careful to ensure that the leasehold improvements do not become a modification of the original asset which would be a breach of the replacement asset restrictions.

      I have heard through the grapevine that the ATO will be issuing a ruling in the next few months to clean this issue up.

  • Pingback: Improvements & Renovation to SMSF Properties with Borrowings | EvolveMySuper

  • Kris_Evolved

    October 9, 2011 at 1:28 pm

    Please note that SMSFR 2011/D1 no enables a property that has been purchased under a limited recourse loan arrangement to be renovated providing the SMSF uses its own monies (not additional borrowings) and that a replacement asset is not created.

    This is great news for all SMSF trustees and property investors and opens up some great new strategies to improve and profit from property investment in the extremely tax effective environment of a SMSF.

    For further information, please check out the following article:


Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2020 by Grow SMSF Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Registered Agent Number 26057627.

General Information Warning & Disclaimer

All information contained on this website is provided as an information service only and, therefore, does not constitute, and should not be relied upon as, financial product advice. None of the information provided takes into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs, and you will need to make your own decision about how to proceed. Alternatively, for financial product advice that takes account of your particular objectives, financial situation or needs, you should consider seeking financial advice from an Australian Financial Services licensee before making a financial decision.

Grow SMSF does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) and we are not authorised representatives of a AFSL. We do not provide financial product advice or recommend any financial products either expressly or implied.

From time to time Grow SMSF may produce information or content about specific financial products or services that enable access to specific financial products however we do not recommend, endorse or confirm as suitable any financial product or service featured on the Grow SMSF website or social media assets. This condition specifically applies to any financial product where Grow SMSF provides services at a discounted or preferential fee due to the use of those products, services or accounts. It’s not compulsory to utilise a specific account or service provider to be a client of Grow SMSF however the types of accounts, investments and service providers you use for your SMSF will determine the fees your SMSF is charged.

Where Grow SMSF provides information in relation to a financial product or service supported by or integrated with Grow SMSF the information is factual information only about the operation of the account or service and how data or reporting information is made available to us. Before making a decision on any financial product for your SMSF you should obtain a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to that product and consider the PDS before making any decision. As financial product and solution providers are frequently making changes to their products and services Grow SMSF cannot accept any responsibility for any outdated or inaccurate information provided on this website or via social media assets.

Grow SMSF Gold Coast based accountants looking after SMSF trustees from around Australia. Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.